Energy-Efficient Machine Selection Guide

This guide explains how to evaluate plastic machine energy efficiency during selection. It covers motor ratings, cycle times, and control systems to help buyers balance performance with lower operating costs.
- Check motor ratings and actual load profiles, not just nameplate power, to estimate true energy draw.
- Compare cycle times and energy per shot or per meter across similar machine classes to separate performance from waste.
- Prioritize controls that adjust speed and temperature based on real-time production data rather than fixed settings.
- Verify auxiliary equipment like chillers and dryers, which often consume more power than the main drive.
How to Read a Machine Energy Rating
Most buyers compare kilowatt ratings first. That is a starting point, not the answer. A machine rated at 120 kW does not necessarily draw 120 kW during a normal cycle. It peaks at 120 kW during the full-temperature melt phase, then drops when the screw retracts or the hydraulic system idles. The nameplate value indicates the maximum continuous rating the motor can handle, not the average consumption over a shift.
Check the manufacturer’s energy report. It should list the average power draw over a 48-hour period, not just the maximum. If you only see a nameplate value, ask for the rated load at 50 percent and 80 percent production. The difference between these two points tells you how much of the motor is doing useful work versus sitting at idle. For example, if a 120 kW machine draws 45 kW at 50 percent load and 95 kW at 80 percent load, the curve between those points reveals the efficiency of the drive system. A linear increase suggests a well-matched variable frequency drive. A steep jump indicates mechanical friction or hydraulic losses that scale poorly with load.
Look for the power factor as well. A low power factor means the motor wastes energy as heat in the electrical grid before it reaches the machine. Modern variable frequency drives improve this, but older fixed-speed motors can lag significantly. If the machine uses a large hydraulic pump, the energy loss in the pump can exceed the loss in the main motor. Ask the vendor for the overall efficiency coefficient, which combines the motor, the drive, and the hydraulic circuit. This number gives a truer picture of how much of the electricity you pay for actually moves plastic.
What Cycle Time Tells You About Efficiency
Cycle time is the time from clamp opening to the next shot. Shorter cycles reduce energy cost per part. But a short cycle is not always efficient. If you shorten the cycle by increasing clamp pressure, you may overheat the mold. If you shorten it by reducing melt temperature, you risk incomplete filling. The goal is to find the shortest cycle that maintains part quality, not the absolute fastest cycle the machine can achieve.
Compare cycle times at the same output rate. Two machines may both produce 1,000 parts per hour, but one may use a 1.2 second mold open time while the other uses 0.9 seconds. The difference seems small. Over a full shift, that 0.3 second gap multiplies into thousands of seconds of extra heating and pumping. Each second of open mold time allows heat to escape from the mold cavity. The heater bands must work harder to restore the temperature before the next shot. This extra heating load increases the energy cost per part, even if the total cycle time difference is negligible on the timer.
Measure the energy per part, not the energy per hour. If Machine A runs 4,000 parts in an 8-hour shift using 3,200 kWh, the cost per part is 0.8 kWh. Machine B produces the same number of parts in 10 hours using 4,500 kWh, costing 1.125 kWh per part. Machine B looks slower, but it is also less efficient. This metric separates true waste from slower production. It forces you to look at the relationship between throughput and consumption. A machine that runs slower but consumes proportionally less energy per part is often cheaper to operate than a faster machine that burns through power at a high rate.
Comparing Motor and Drive Systems
The main drive motor sets the baseline energy draw. Look for variable frequency drives that match motor speed to load. A fixed-speed motor running at full power while the machine idles wastes energy. A VFD reduces speed when the process does not require full torque. This matching is critical because the motor often runs at reduced speed during the injection and cooling phases of the cycle. If the motor stays at full speed, it draws more current than necessary, heating the windings and drawing power from the grid without doing proportional work.
Check the hydraulic system next. Hydraulic pumps are often the second largest energy consumer. Look for pumps with low leakage. A pump with worn seals can waste 30 percent or more of its power as heat. Ask the vendor for the pump efficiency at partial load. Many pumps lose efficiency quickly as flow drops. When the machine is not injecting, the pump may only need to supply a small amount of flow to maintain clamp pressure. If the pump is not designed for high efficiency at low flow, it will circulate fluid unnecessarily, generating heat in the lines and the tank.
Electric machines generally have lower friction losses than hydraulic machines of similar size. However, electric machines often require more precise temperature control. If the process is sensitive, the extra heating time can offset the motor savings. Evaluate the total system, not just the drive. Consider the cooling system that must remove the heat generated by the motor and the hydraulics. A highly efficient motor that generates heat faster than the cooling system can remove it will run at a higher temperature, increasing the risk of insulation degradation and reducing lifespan.
Evaluating Auxiliary Equipment Energy
The main machine is only part of the load. A plastic plant includes dryers, chillers, air compressors, and lighting. These auxiliary systems can add 20 to 40 percent to the total energy bill. Ignoring them leads to a false comparison between machines. Two machines with identical energy ratings may have very different operating costs if one comes with a basic chiller and the other with a high-efficiency unit.
Check the chiller first. A chiller running at full capacity when the machine only needs partial cooling wastes energy. Look for chiller controls that adjust compressor speed based on return water temperature. If the chiller runs on a fixed timer, it will overcool the mold water and waste electricity. Overcooling can cause condensation in the mold, which leads to water spots on the part and longer drying times. It also stresses the compressor, as it runs at full capacity when the load is low. A variable speed compressor that modulates its speed to match the thermal load of the machine saves significant power and reduces wear on the mechanical components.
Dryers are another major consumer. A dryer that runs continuously on a full cycle when the material is already dry wastes heat and electricity. Ask about the dryer’s energy per kilogram of material dried. A well-tuned dryer uses less energy because it stops when the moisture target is met. Look for dryers with inline moisture sensors that provide real-time feedback to the control system. These sensors allow the dryer to stop exactly when the material reaches the required moisture level. Without them, the dryer must run on a fixed timer, which often leads to over-drying. Over-drying not only wastes energy but can also degrade the polymer, affecting the final part quality.
Air compressors for mold cooling or blow molding also matter. A compressor with a low duty cycle idles and wastes power. Look for variable speed compressors that match air demand to the machine’s actual use. If the air demand is intermittent, a fixed-speed compressor will cycle on and off, consuming energy during start-up and shut-down cycles. A variable speed compressor can throttle down to meet the demand, maintaining pressure without the energy penalty of full-speed operation. This is particularly important for blow molding machines that require air for the blow valve, as the demand is not constant throughout the cycle.
Using Spec Comparison to Narrow Choices
When you have two or three machines to compare, put their specs side by side. Do not compare only the largest number. Compare the energy draw at the same production rate. The table below outlines the key criteria to evaluate.
| Criterion | What to look for | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Rating | Average power draw at 50% and 80% load | Shows real energy use, not peak capability |
| Cycle Time | Seconds per shot or meter at target output | Directly impacts energy per unit produced |
| Hydraulic Pump | Efficiency at partial load | Low leakage saves significant power during idle |
| Chiller Control | Variable speed compressor or timer based | Prevents overcooling and wasted electricity |
| Dryer Control | Moisture based shutdown or fixed timer | Reduces unnecessary heat generation |
| Drive Type | VFD or fixed speed with soft start | VFDs match speed to load, reducing idle waste |
Use this table to score each machine. Assign points for each criterion. A machine that scores high on hydraulic efficiency but low on chiller control may still be more expensive to run than a machine that balances both. For instance, if the hydraulic system saves 5 kWh per shift but the inefficient chiller wastes 15 kWh, the net result is a loss of 10 kWh. You must look at the total system energy, not individual components in isolation.
When scoring, weight the criteria based on your specific process. If you run a process that requires precise temperature control, give more weight to the chiller control. If you run a process with long idle periods, give more weight to the hydraulic pump efficiency and the drive type. The machine that wins the scorecard is the one that aligns best with your operational profile, not necessarily the one with the highest individual ratings.
Building a Selection Decision Checklist
Use this checklist to verify your shortlist before signing a purchase order.
- Request the energy report for the specific machine configuration. Do not accept a generic datasheet.
- Confirm the cycle time at your target production rate. Ask for the energy per part calculation.
- Check the hydraulic pump efficiency at 50 percent flow. If the vendor cannot provide this, ask for a third party test.
- Verify chiller and dryer controls. Ask how they adjust to load changes.
- Calculate the total energy cost including auxiliary equipment. Add 25 percent for lighting and air compression if not specified.
- Compare the cost per part at your expected energy rate. A machine that costs more upfront may save money if it uses less energy.
- Check the service plan. A machine that requires frequent service will have higher downtime and higher energy waste during restarts.
The selection process is not about finding the machine with the lowest price. It is about finding the machine that produces your target output with the least wasted energy. If you get the specifications right, you will see the savings in the operating budget, not just the purchase price. Focus on the total cost of ownership over the life of the machine, including maintenance, energy, and potential downtime. A machine that requires less frequent service and operates at lower energy levels will deliver better long-term value, even if the initial purchase price is higher.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know if a machine's energy rating is accurate?
Ask for a third party test report or a 48 hour average power draw. Nameplate ratings only show peak capacity, not actual use.
What is the difference between energy per part and energy per hour?
Energy per part measures waste relative to output. Energy per hour measures total load. A slow machine with high efficiency can have a lower energy per part than a fast machine with poor control.
Do electric machines always use less energy than hydraulic machines?
Not always. Electric machines have lower motor losses, but they may need more heating time for sensitive materials. Compare the total system energy, not just the drive type.
How much energy do auxiliary systems use?
Chillers, dryers, and compressors can add 20 to 40 percent to the total energy bill. Always include them in your cost model.
What is the best way to compare two machines?
Use the same production rate and same part type. Compare the energy per part, not the total kWh. This removes the effect of speed and isolates efficiency.


